REALTOR Code of Ethics – Article 10

REALTORS® shall not deny equal professional services to any person for reasons of race, color, religion, sex, disability, familial status, national origin, sexual orientation, or gender identity. REALTORS® shall not be parties to any plan or agreement to discriminate against a person or persons on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, disability, familial status, national origin, sexual orientation, or gender identity. (Amended 1/23)

REALTORS®, in their real estate employment practices, shall not discriminate against any person or persons on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, disability, familial status, national origin, sexual orientation, or gender identity. (Amended 1/23)


Stephanie Bice OK-5 (R)

Rep. Stephanie Bice (OK-5): what she’s backed — and who it harms 1) Anti-LGBTQ / trans-targeting actions 2) Anti-immigrant actions 3) Anti-diversity / anti-DEI stance 4) Oklahoma’s current policies — and why they matter to her constituents How these choices harm Oklahomans:Blocking care and accurate documents increases harassment and mental-health risk among trans youth; bathroom…

Sen. Markwayne Mullin OK (R)

Sen. Markwayne Mullin (OK): what he’s backed — and who it harms 1) Most consequential anti-LGBTQ / transphobic actions 2) Most consequential anti-immigrant actions & statements 3) Anti-diversity / anti-DEI signals While the House has carried marquee “DEI-to-DIE” bills, Mullin’s public statements and NDAA rider support show a clear federal anti-DEI posture. Congress.gov 4) Oklahoma’s…

Tim Moore NC-14 (R)

Rep. Tim Moore (NC-14): what he’s backed—and who it harms Most consequential actions & statements 1) Anti-LGBTQ / transphobic 2) Anti-immigrant 3) Anti-diversity / DEI Current NC policies & how they harm residents Other homophobic/transphobic actions or policies he’s backed Why this matters to North Carolinians in NC-14 (and statewide) A call to REALTORS® &…

Pat Harrigan NC-10 (R)

Rep. Pat Harrigan (NC-10): What he’s backed—and who it harms 1) Anti-LGBTQ / anti-trans actions Why this hurts NC: Trans North Carolinians who rely on Medicaid/CHIP or ACA coverage would face sudden coverage denials for care endorsed by major medical bodies, raising costs, disrupting treatment, and worsening mental-health outcomes—particularly in rural counties across the 10th…

Addison McDowell-NC6 (R)

Rep. Addison McDowell Policies that Harm North Carolinians Rep. Addison McDowell has built his short congressional career around pushing legislation that directly undermines LGBTQ rights, immigrant families, and diversity initiatives. His actions not only stigmatize vulnerable populations—they also weaken the economy and community fabric of North Carolina. Anti-LGBTQ / Homophobic Legislation Impact on NC: Roughly…

No More Deflections — Enforce Article 10 in Every Endorsement

For years, REALTORS® have been told half-truths and distractions about RPAC and the American Property Owners Alliance (APOA). We’re told donations are voluntary, decisions are local, and everything is bipartisan and transparent. The reality is far different: hidden fees, dark money, and endorsements of anti-diversity candidates directly undermine Article 10 of the REALTOR® Code of…

Silence = Endorsement: How NAR Lets Harmful Candidates Through

DISTRACTION: “National doesn’t control endorsements, the local committee does.” FACT: While local committees initiate endorsements, National RPAC holds veto power. If National objects, the endorsement is canceled and the result is neutrality. By refusing to negate endorsements of anti-LGBTQ+ and anti-diversity candidates, NAR effectively approves them. One of the most common defenses REALTORS® hear is:…

Myth-Busting RPAC: Forced “Fines” Disguised as Donations

DISTRACTION: “If your phone rings in class, or you’re late back from break, you have to donate $35 to the PAC to continue.” FACT: PAC donations must be voluntary. Forcing REALTORS® to “donate” as punishment violates federal law, RPAC’s own guidelines, and our Code of Ethics. Too many REALTORS® have stories of being “fined” during…

Choice Means Choice — Stop Tricking REALTORS® Into Paying PAC Dollars

Distraction: PAC donations are voluntary. You only give if you choose to. Fact: Renewal forms bury “optional” PAC donations as pre-checked defaults — and add mandatory advocacy or activism fees with little transparency. Members shouldn’t have to opt out of hidden charges or pay non-optional fees that underwrite politics against Article 10 of the Code…

America Property Owners Alliance Secrecy Breeds Disenfranchisement

Distraction: Members know where the PAC & APOA money goes — it’s transparent. Fact: Most REALTORS® have never even heard of the American Property Owners Alliance. Even local leaders who asked for details were stonewalled. Lack of transparency = disenfranchisement of members. The Transparency Myth NAR leaders often insist that political spending is open and…

When Dues Fund Discrimination: American Property Owners Alliance & Article 10

Distraction: American Property Owners Alliance is separate from NAR — it’s not RPAC. Fact: American Property Owners Alliance is funded 100% by NAR dues, run from NAR’s D.C. building, and led by NAR insiders. It funnels millions into conservative causes that attack DEI, reproductive rights, and equity — in direct violation of Article 10 of…

The Myth of Bipartisanship — REALTORS® Deserve the Truth

Distraction: NAR is bipartisan. RPAC splits donations 50/50 between Democrats and Republicans. Fact: Through the American Property Owners Alliance, NAR secretly funneled nearly $10 million to conservative groups pushing agendas against racial equity, abortion rights, and DEI — issues far outside housing. Member dues are being weaponized without transparency. The Bipartisan Story We’re Told For…

You Can’t Celebrate Us and Fund Our Oppression

Distraction: NAR honors our diversity groups: LGBTQ+ Real Estate Alliance, Asian Real Estate Association of America, National Association of Hispanic Real Estate Professionals, Women’s Council of REALTORS®, and the National Association of Real Estate Brokers. Fact: Endorsing or funding candidates who are anti-immigrant, anti-DEI, anti-Asian, anti–body autonomy, or anti-LGBTQ directly violates our Code of Ethics.…

The President’s Circle Mirage: Perks Can’t Excuse Ethics Violations

Distraction: If you donate over $5,000, you can decide who gets that donation — plus you get a free vacation to a tropical destination. Fact: PAC donations can’t be earmarked. In President’s Circle, you must first give RPAC $1,000, then donate directly to select candidates. If you want to back someone, donate directly — no…

Token Gestures Aren’t Diversity — They’re Distractions

Distraction: We’re pro-diversity — we even supported a Democrat in a city council race last year. Fact: Token endorsements don’t erase systemic blind spots. NAR’s state and national funding must meet the higher bar of Article 10 of the Code of Ethics — not just offer occasional gestures. Systemic racism, sexism, and gender bias must…

If the PAC Is “Separate,” Why Does It Dominate Everything We Do?

Distraction: The PAC is separate from the Association. Fact: If it were truly separate, why are we hit with PAC fundraising at every dues renewal, meeting, and email? Why does Association leadership attack us when we question RPAC? In practice, the PAC is treated as more important than the Code of Ethics itself. The Story…

RPAC is NAR. They are inseparable

Distraction: The PAC isn’t NAR. It doesn’t have to follow the Code of Ethics. Fact: REALTOR® PAC is inseparable from NAR. Its boards are made up of REALTORS®, meetings are held in REALTOR® offices, and associations constantly fundraise for it. The PAC is NAR — and its endorsements must reflect our Code of Ethics. The…

The “Friendly Incumbent” Excuse: A Moving Target

Distraction: We only back incumbents who support property issues — that’s the ‘Friendly Incumbent Rule.’ Fact: This “rule” is used inconsistently. When convenient, it justifies endorsing anti-diversity candidates. When ignored, it’s abandoned without explanation. It’s a gaslighting tactic to excuse funding harmful politicians. A Convenient “Rule” Ask why RPAC is endorsing a controversial candidate and…

The Myth of the “Friendly Incumbent” Rule

Distraction: We follow the ‘Friendly Incumbent’ rule — if a candidate supported REALTOR® issues before, we endorse them again. Fact: This “policy” isn’t written anywhere — it’s just tradition. The real question: how EXTREME does a candidate have to be before RPAC stops endorsing? If they committed a crime, we wouldn’t blindly support them. So…

Marriage Equality: A Core Property Rights Issue

Distraction: LGBTQ rights, like marriage equality, are just social issues. We only focus on property rights. Fact: Marriage is a property rights issue. Spouses share legal rights to property owned before, acquired or sold during, and inherited after death. Attacking marriage equality is an attack on core property rights. The Convenient Excuse When REALTORS® raise…

The Myth of “Equal Donations = Neutrality”

Distraction: We donate equally to both Democrats and Republicans, so we’re not taking sides. Fact: While donations may appear evenly split, that’s not the point. Anti-diversity candidates are still funded and endorsed. The “party balance” line is a distraction — Article 10 must be enforced for every endorsement and donation. The Neutrality Claim Whenever REALTORS®…

The False Promise of “Change from the Inside”

Distraction: Join a committee and make change from the inside. Fact: In gerrymandered states, LGBTQ+ and pro-diversity voices are outvoted or locked out of PAC committees. Joining means being forced to fund candidates you oppose. We don’t have to fund and participate in our oppression to demand that Article 10 be enforced. The Comfortable Deflection…

Who Really Decides? Breaking Down the Myth of “Local-Only” PAC Control

Distraction: All decisions are made at the local level. If you want a voice, you have to join the local PAC committee — and that means donating to get a seat at the table. Fact: National RPAC sets binding rules on federal donations and PAC operations. Rules can be changed. Forcing REALTORS® to fund their…

Richard Hudson-NC9 (R)

Homophobic / Anti-LGBTQ Actions Anti-Immigrant Policies Anti-Diversity / Anti-DEI Efforts Summary Table Area Policy or Statement Anti-LGBTQ Voted against hate crimes protections for LGBTQ; opposed marriage equality amendment Anti-Immigrant Co-sponsored RAISE Act; sponsored Medicaid restrictions for undocumented individuals; supported mandatory deportation legislation Anti-Diversity (Indirect) Immigration and healthcare policies that reduce support for immigrant communities—thereby curtailing…

Sen Marsha Blackburn (R)

Homophobic / Anti-LGBTQ Actions Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) Opposed Hate Crime & Marriage Equality Efforts Anti-LGBTQ Platform Influence Anti-Immigrant / Anti-Refugee Actions “Preventing Violence Against Women by Illegal Aliens Act” & CONTAINER Act (Jan 2025) Campaign Rhetoric: “Criminal Illegal Aliens” and Mass Deportation Anti-Diversity / Anti-DEI Policies Dismantle DEI Act Targeting University DEI Programs…

Sen John Thune (R)

Homophobic / Anti-LGBTQ Record Anti-Immigrant Policy Actions Anti-Diversity / DEI Signals Summary Table Category Notable Actions or Statements Homophobic / Anti-LGBTQ Voted against hate-crime protections inclusive of LGBTQ individuals (2009) Anti-Immigrant Opposed bipartisan immigration reform; championed border enforcement provisions in large GOP packages Anti-Diversity / DEI Supported limiting pay for DEI-focused federal positions, signaling resistance…

Elise Stefanik-NY21 (R)

Homophobic / Anti-Trans Actions Anti-Diversity / Anti-DEI Initiatives Immigration Stance Summary Table Category Actions / Statements Anti-Trans Supported investigation of inclusive school policies; voted for trans athlete ban; supported gender-affirming care ban. Anti-Diversity / DEI Led legislation to protect single-sex groups on campus; branded DEI as antisemitic; contributed to DEI rollback in academia. Rep. Stefanik…

Keith Self-TX3 (R)

Anti-Trans Statement & Behavior Misgendering Rep. Sarah McBride at a Congressional Hearing Context & Significance Summary Table Category Incident / Action Homophobia Repeatedly misgendered a transgender colleague in a House hearing Anti-Immigrant No notable record or sponsored legislation identified